Rhetorical Reading Response: "War on HighSchool"
In this informative article,
"The War on High Schools" by Wendy Kaminer (1999), Kaminer
claims that schools in during that time had a zero tolerance policy in schools
that could poosibly be hurting instead of helping students. The author of this
story supports her thesis by sharing her personal experiences and using that to
strengthen her point. The purpose of this article was to share with others how
the "zero tolerance policy" in schools was developed in order to help
but instead it ended up causing a lot of new cases with high school students
which in turn hurt them. This article's audience was anyone who wanted to know
about the school system in that time period.
The assigned reading for this blog
is called "The War on High Schools". It is essentially stating how as
students our rights to free speech and individuality are monitored and or taken
away. For example, in the reading there was a teenager who wore a pro-vegan
t-shirt to school and was held under suspension by the federal courts because
his shirt was a "gang symbol ". As a response to the t-shirt incident
the Judge on that case stated that “Schools need to run, and administrators need to make rules,”
and finished by saying “That’s the only reason they exist.” "The
desire to regiment students is sometimes quite overt. Character First, a
character education program for elementary school students, requires children
to memorize this poem about attentiveness: “I will look at someone speaking /
And I’ll listen all I can / I will sit or stand up straight / like a soldier on
command.”" That poem alone is evident that students no longer have the
right to openly express themselves and that their right to free speech is
stripped away. That upsets me beyond any scale because not only does that
affect their school life but their private lives as well. Due to their school's
strict policy they will no longer feel comfortable expressing themselves and
this will probably cause chaos for them growing up because they may always feel
like everything they do is controlled.
Wendy Kaminer uses her personal
experiences and factual evidence from around the country to strengthen her
information on high schools, and how the school systems are bigoted. Her remark
“They’re suspending and expelling even grade school students for making what
might be considered, at worst, inappropriate remarks, dressing oddly, or simply
expressing political opinions” indicated that the administration would nitpick
at every ounce of freedom the students tried to obtain (Kaminer paragraph3).
They explained their reasoning as being “fearful of violence and drugs”
(Kaminer paragraph 3). Although Kaminer described most of her high school staff
to be unpleasant, she stated that “There were some very good teachers that
encouraged curiosity” (Kaminer paragraph1). High schools in the mid-1960’s was
similar to those of today, in the aspect of making students feel like they have
no rights when it comes to discipline, “Americas public schools are becoming
increasingly Kafkaesque”, Kaminer says (Kaminer paragraph3). She entails on the
problems the students in different countries have with the school system to
display that these outrageous punishments are not in only occurring in one
area. Kaminer states that a 10th grade boy in Virginia was
suspended for “dying his hair blue” (Kaminer paragraph 4). School systems are
taking unnecessary precautions, not realizing that they are making students
feel like they are in a box. Questions that Kaminer asked accompanying those
feelings were, “Why do we treat students like criminal subjects?”, “How will
students learn about freedom when schools treat censorship and conformity as
social goods?” (Kaminer paragraph12). Kaminer does a great job of using these
examples and questions to get her point across to the readers.
I like how paragraph 2 has quotes to give insight into the story.
ReplyDeleteI certainly agree with you all about how upset you are after reading this. Kids should be able to go to school to express themselves and learn at the same time.
ReplyDeleteI liked how you guys used many supporting details to prove your reasoning
ReplyDeleteThe essay is very well developed. As I began to read the second paragraph, I like specific details that were used that were relatable and expanded on them. I specially agree with the comment that student's personal lives are being affected.
ReplyDeleteWe had similar ideas but you all used different in text quotations than us. You all talked about how the judge said, "“Schools need to run, and administrators need to make rules,” and finished by saying “That’s the only reason they exist.” That was a good quotation from the text because it is a true statement for a lot of schools. They make up harsh rules that don't even need to be enforced.
ReplyDelete